fbpx
Connect with us

Louisiana Illuminator

Seeing ‘Red’ after Taylor Swift debacle, lawmakers weigh concert ticket rules

Published

on

lailluminator.com – Kevin Hardy – 2023-09-02 05:00:26
 

Seeing ‘Red' after Taylor Swift debacle, lawmakers weigh concert ticket rules

by Kevin Hardy, Louisiana Illuminator
September 2, 2023

There's no question what motivated state Rep. Kelly Moller to push for changes in Minnesota law on concert ticket sales.

“Really, it was the Taylor Swift debacle for me,” she said.

A self-professed Swiftie, the Democrat found herself among millions of other Americans unable to buy tickets last year to Swift's Eras Tour.

She preregistered for tickets, but never received a code to buy them. And on the day sales went live online, she sat by as friends with codes got bumped out of the ticket queue for no apparent reason. Then Ticketmaster's website crashed.

The ordeal convinced her that the concert ticket industry warrants more government oversight.

“I do think a lot of that is better served at the federal level, but that said, there are things we can do at the state level,” she said.

Moller introduced a bill this year that would force ticket sellers to disclose the full cost of tickets, including fees, up front to buyers in her state. It also would ban speculative ticketing — a practice in which resale companies sell tickets they don't yet own.

The bill stalled, but Moller expects it to be reconsidered next year. It is part of a wave of legislation considered in more than a dozen states this year following the unprecedented disaster in the run-up to Swift's Eras Tour, which is on pace to be the highest-grossing tour in history.

Secondary event ticket websites under the spotlight in Louisiana proposal

Swift and her legions of fans were outraged when Ticketmaster's website crashed last November as it faced unprecedented demand from fans, bots and ticket resellers ahead of her tour. Social media blew up over the fiasco, and news organizations published story after story. It sparked bipartisan legislative proposals in Congress, though no bill has become law yet.

That's led state legislatures to step in: Lawmakers of both parties across the country introduced new bills this year to regulate concert and live event ticket purchasing.

Ticketing fights are far more contentious than anyone anticipates. Each side of the market likes to blame the other side, and consumers are stuck in the middle.

– Brian Hess, Sports Fans Coalition executive director

It's a rare bipartisan issue in statehouses. But lawmakers are learning how complicated — and controversial — the world of online ticketing is. In several states, legislators are caught in the middle between companies like Ticketmaster and secondary sellers such as StubHub.

“There are a lot of issues that beg for a national focus, a national solution. But because of the political dynamics in Washington, D.C., we haven't gotten very many solutions. … So states believe they have to act,” said California state Sen. Bill Dodd, a Democrat.

Dodd sponsored a bill this year that would ban so-called junk fees on tickets — fees tacked onto the base price that lawmakers view as deceptive. The proposal targets other services, including hotel and resort fees, but Dodd said concerts were a major driver. President Joe Biden called out junk fees in his State of the Union address in February and has publicly praised companies that have committed to transparent pricing, such as Airbnb and Live Nation, Ticketmaster's parent company.

Dodd said he isn't hostile to ticket marketplaces such as Ticketmaster and StubHub. He uses those sites to buy tickets to concerts and basketball games. But, he said, consumers should know the full price up front. The White House estimates junk fees cost Americans more than $65 billion per year.

“It's outrageous,” he said, “and I think Californians are sick and tired of dishonest fees being tacked onto just anything.”

GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

SUBSCRIBE

Dodd's bill, which was backed by California Democratic Attorney General Rob Bonta, passed the state Senate and is pending in the Assembly. It is one of several ticketing bills considered by Golden State lawmakers this session.

The state Senate unanimously passed a proposal from Republican state Sen. Scott Wilk that he said targets the “stranglehold” some companies have over sales. The bill would prohibit exclusivity clauses in contracts between a primary ticket seller such as Ticketmaster and an entertainment venue in California. Wilk said in his news release it would allow artists to work with other ticket sellers without the fear of retaliation from large ticket sellers — and ultimately reduce fees for consumers. It's in committee in the Assembly.

‘The states are where it's at'

Earlier this year, the Colorado legislature passed a bill that would have required sellers to fully disclose the total cost of event tickets, prohibited vendors from raising prices during the buying process and banned speculative ticketing.

But Democratic Gov. Jared Polis vetoed the act in June, saying it could prevent competition and “risk upsetting the successful entertainment ecosystem in Colorado.”

Chris Castle, an entertainment lawyer who tracks ticket legislation across the country, said the Colorado veto illustrates the industry's ability to sway public officials.

Polis referenced concerns he heard from the National Consumers League and the Consumer Federation of America. Both of those consumer advocacy groups have received funding from secondary ticket marketplaces such as StubHub, the music publication Pitchfork reported.

“It'd be easy enough to say, ‘Well, I heard from the stakeholders, and I thought these guys had the better argument.' But he didn't say that,” Castle said of Polis. “He starts talking about these groups. And sure enough, it turns out, they're all on the take.”

Conor Cahill, the governor's spokesperson, did not answer questions about the influence of ticket marketplaces on the veto, but said Polis will apply a “consumer-first lens” to future legislation on the issue.

The National Consumers League has no problem being associated with groups like StubHub, said John Breyault, the organization's vice president of public policy, telecommunications and fraud. He said the group shares a common belief with resellers that the marketplace needs more competition, not less. But it still disagrees on some specific issues, he said.

“There are problems at every level of the industry including in the secondary market that we are trying to address through both our advocacy at the state level and our advocacy at the federal level,” Breyault said.

Bills in several states backed by StubHub aim to protect so-called transferability of tickets — that is, the customers' right to pass on or resell tickets they purchase.

Six states — Colorado, Connecticut, Illinois, New York, Utah and Virginia — currently protect the right of fans to transfer or sell tickets. Without that right, some advocates say Ticketmaster's terms and conditions can ban transferring tickets or require that they be resold on their own platform.

StubHub makes no secret of its efforts to educate and persuade state lawmakers.

“The states are really where it's at in a lot of ways,” said Laura Dooley, the company's head of global government relations. “Our industry right now is almost exclusively regulated at the state level.”

This year, the company has tracked nearly 70 ticketing bills proposed across 25 states. Dooley said many state lawmakers introduce new regulations with good intentions, but don't always understand the industry.

As an example, she pointed to state efforts to ban bots — software that can bypass security measures in online ticketing systems and buy tickets in bulk faster than humans.

Ticketmaster cited bots as a major cause of the Eras Tour fiasco. Bots are banned by federal law, though that regulation only has been enforced once since 2016, according to the Federal Trade Commission. Dooley said StubHub isn't opposed to state bot bans, but does push legislators to consider enforcement measures in crafting their bills. That's because regulators need cooperation from the industry and access to ticketing software to monitor for bots, Dooley said.

Dooley contends some lawmakers' proposed solutions don't target root causes, including the unique way live event tickets are sold, generally through exclusive deals with one retail platform.

“When you have millions and millions of people wanting to buy a product and they're being asked to buy that product at the same time on the same day through an exclusive retail provider — in this case Ticketmaster and in many cases Ticketmaster — that system is going to be overloaded, right? And it's going to be a frustrating experience,” Dooley said.

In a statement, Ticketmaster said the company was working with lawmakers across the country on “common-sense” ticketing reform measures. The company said it supports requirements for all-in ticketing pricing, bans on speculative ticketing and giving artists more say in how their event tickets are resold.

If someone wants to spend their hard-earned money at $10,000 a ticket to go see Taylor Swift or Jay-Z or the Boston Celtics, giddy up. But I just want that consumer to know going into that initial transaction that they're going to be spending $10,000.

– Massachusetts state Sen. John Velis

Brian Hess, executive director of the nonprofit fan advocacy organization Sports Fans Coalition, pointed out thatlawmakers have a variety of interests to consider: the primary ticket markets like Ticketmaster, the artists, the consumer, and secondary markets like StubHub.

“Ticketing fights are far more contentious than anyone anticipates,” he said. “Each side of the market likes to blame the other side, and consumers are stuck in the middle.”

The Sports Fans Coalition is in part funded by secondary marketplaces like StubHub and lobbies on ticket legislation across the country.

Hess said federal regulators should not have allowed the 2010 merger of Live Nation, an event promoter and venue operator, with Ticketmaster, a ticket provider.

“They are the monopoly in the industry,” he said. “They were the ones that botched Taylor Swift's tickets, and they're the ones that continue to have ticket sale problems when they launch new shows.”

A bipartisan focus

Texas Republican state Rep. Kronda Thimesch said she saw firsthand how bots can distort the marketplace and prevent customers from purchasing tickets.

That's what she blamed for her own daughter's unsuccessful attempts to buy Swift tickets last year.

 

“Fans then have to resort to paying hundreds, if not thousands, over face value to resellers in order to see their favorite artist,” she said.

That's why she introduced a bill banning ticket-buying bots in Texas, which was signed into law by Republican Gov. Greg Abbott.

Thimesch noted that ticket issues aren't just a problem for Swift fans — country star Zach Bryan named his December live album “All My Homies Hate Ticketmaster.” Thimesch said she is open to exploring more ticketing legislation when the Texas legislature reconvenes.

More than 1,500 miles away, Massachusetts Democratic state Sen. John Velis has a similar outlook. He's interested in diving deep into the world of ticketing. But he's starting off small.

“I think the art, if you will, of legislating is you kind of go little by little,” he said. “I think ticket pricing is a great and very logical place to start.”

Velis introduced a bill that would require upfront transparent ticket pricing and ban “dynamic pricing,” a practice in which sellers adjust prices based on demand. While he's interested in eventually exploring ride shares or other services, his legislation is so far focused on concert and live event tickets, he said.

Before the Eras Tour mess, Velis said he got interested in the issue after hearing constituents and co-workers complain about exorbitant fees on live event tickets. Tickets advertised for $100 can sometimes end up costing double that once all the fees are tacked on, he said.

“I just thought to myself, ‘That is so incredibly wrong,'” he said. “If someone wants to spend their hard-earned money at $10,000 a ticket to go see Taylor Swift or Jay-Z or the Boston Celtics, giddy up. But I just want that consumer to know going into that initial transaction that they're going to be spending $10,000.”

Velis said his bill should receive a hearing soon in the state Senate.

Jurisdictional bounds are likely to prove complicated, he acknowledged. After all, consumers often buy tickets for events in other states. But he said his bill is solely aimed at protecting consumers — a notion he says is hard to oppose.

“In my experience, this is without a doubt a bipartisan issue,” he said. “I've experienced nobody raising a concern from a partisan politics standpoint.”

SUPPORT NEWS YOU TRUST.

DONATE

This story was first published by Stateline, part of the States Newsroom nonprofit news network with the . It's supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Stateline maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Scott S. Greenberger for questions: info@stateline.org. Follow Stateline on Facebook and Twitter.

Louisiana Illuminator is part of States Newsroom, a network of news bureaus supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Louisiana Illuminator maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Greg LaRose for questions: info@lailluminator.com. Follow Louisiana Illuminator on Facebook and Twitter.

Read More

The post Seeing ‘Red' after Taylor Swift debacle, lawmakers weigh concert ticket rules appeared first on lailluminator.com

Please follow and like us:
Pin Share

Louisiana Illuminator

Trump comes out against Alabama IVF ruling as national Republicans scramble for distance

Published

on

lailluminator.com – Jacob Fischler – 2024-02-23 16:47:02

Trump comes out against Alabama IVF ruling as national Republicans scramble for distance

by Jacob Fischler, Louisiana Illuminator
February 23, 2024

Former President Donald Trump called on Alabama lawmakers Friday to “find an immediate solution” to remedy a state Supreme Court ruling that threatened the availability of in vitro fertilization, and national Republicans running for Congress sought to distance themselves from the Alabama decision as well.

In a post to his social media site, Truth Social, Trump said the Alabama Supreme Court ruling last week that gave fertilized embryos the same rights as children was at odds with the anti-abortion movement that is influential in the Republican Party.

The front-runner for the GOP presidential nomination endorsed efforts by Alabama legislators to tweak state law — which includes one of the most restrictive bans on abortion — to protect IVF.

“Today, I am calling on the Alabama Legislature to act quickly to find an immediate solution to preserve the availability of IVF in Alabama,” the post read, in Trump's first public comments since the Alabama ruling. “The Republican Party should always be on the side of the Miracle of Life – and the side of Mothers, Fathers, and their Beautiful Babies. IVF is an important part of that.”

IVF, a common fertility practice, involves harvesting a woman's eggs and fertilizing them outside the body. The resulting embryos are frozen and stored for future transfer into a uterus, but couples often create more embryos than they end up using.

The Alabama justices' ruling could open prospective parents and clinics to criminal charges of abandonment or manslaughter for embryos that are destroyed rather than implanted into a uterus.

Leaders in Alabama's Legislature scrambled late this week to address the ruling, with a key committee chairman authoring a bill to declare embryos created during IVF would not be considered a human life unless implanted into a uterus.

The decision led to the closure of at least three IVF programs in the state this week and inspired intense criticism of anti-abortion Republicans from Democrats from President Joe Biden on down.

U.S. Supreme Court decision

The ruling was a continuation of Republicans' attempts in the states to control pregnancy after the U.S. Supreme Court 2022 ruling overturning the constitutional right to an abortion, many national Democrats said this week.

“They came for abortion first. Now it's IVF and next it'll be birth control,” Trump's 2016 Democratic rival Hillary Clinton said in a tweet Thursday. “The extreme right won't stop trying to exert government control over our most sacred personal decisions until we codify reproductive freedom as a human right.”

The House Majority PAC, which helps Democrats running for the U.S. House, compiled a list Friday of Republicans in competitive districts who'd voted for legislation the group said would have the same effect nationally as the Alabama Supreme Court's ruling.

Biden, who is likely to face Trump in the November general election, is seeking to hold the former president responsible. Trump appointed three of the six justices who voted to overturn abortion protections.

Biden campaign director Julie Chavez Rodriguez said in a statement that Trump bore responsibility for the Alabama decision and other restrictions on abortion and fertility treatment.

“American women couldn't care less what Donald Trump posts on Truth Social, they care that they can't access fertility treatment because of him,” Chavez Rodriguez said. “Let's be clear: Alabama families losing access to IVF is a direct result of Donald Trump's Supreme Court justices overturning Roe v. Wade.”

U.S. Senate GOP campaign arm sends out memo

Trump's position — that Alabama lawmakers should find a legislative fix to protect IVF after the court's ruling — is in line with U.S. Senate Republicans' campaign arm.

National Republican Senatorial Committee Executive Director Jason Thielman sent a memo to GOP Senate candidates, Politico reported Friday.

The memo instructed candidates to “Clearly state your support for IVF and fertility-related services as blessings for those seeking to have children” and to “Publicly oppose any efforts to restrict access to IVF and other fertility treatments, framing such opposition as a defense of family values and individual freedom,” according to the Politico report.

Five GOP Senate hopefuls in key races then issued statements expressing support for IVF. The candidates were Kari Lake in Arizona, Tim Sheehy in Montana, Sam Brown in Nevada, Mike Rogers in Michigan and Matt Dolan in Ohio.

Former United Nations Ambassador Nikki Haley, the last Republican still challenging Trump's 2024 nomination, sent mixed messages this week about her position.

The former South Carolina governor said in an NBC News interview Wednesday that she personally agreed that embryos “are babies,” and that the Alabama court ruled correctly under state law. But she later told CNN's Jake Tapper she disagreed with the ruling and said the state should reexamine the law.

Alabama lawmakers search for fix

Alabama legislators worked Thursday to file legislation addressing the court's ruling.

Republican Tim Melson, the chair of the Alabama Senate's Healthcare Committee, drafted a bill on Thursday that would declare that a human egg fertilized in vitro would not be considered a human life unless implanted in a uterus.

Alabama House Democratic Leader Anthony Daniels, a candidate in Alabama's 2nd Congressional District, filed a bill that said that a fertilized egg or human embryo outside a uterus shall not “be considered an unborn child, a minor child, a natural person, or any other term that connotes a human being for any purpose under state law.”

Gov. Kay Ivey, a Republican, and leaders of the Alabama Legislature, which has a Republican supermajority, expressed a cautious desire to address the Supreme Court's ruling.

Ivey, who signed Alabama's near-total abortion ban in 2019, said in a statement Friday that she looked forward “to continue closely following this issue.”

“Following the ruling from the Alabama Supreme Court, I said that in our state, we work to foster a culture of life,” the statement said. “This certainly includes some couples hoping and praying to be parents who utilize IVF.”

Alabama House Speaker Nathaniel Ledbetter said in a statement Friday that the Legislature would “soon consider a solution” to the issue.

“Alabamians strongly believe in protecting the rights of the unborn, but the result of the State Supreme Court ruling denies many couples the opportunity to conceive, which is a direct contradiction,” the statement said.

Senate President Pro Tem Greg Reed told reporters Thursday the chamber was weighing options.

“If we're supposed to do something or there's an opportunity for us to do something with it, what would we do?” he asked. “How would we address that? And so we've got some smart legal minds trying to help us understand.”

The office of the state's Republican attorney general, Steve Marshall, said in a statement ​​he “has no intention of using the recent Alabama Supreme Court decision as a basis for prosecuting IVF families or providers.”

Senate Minority Leader Bobby Singleton, a Democrat, said that Democrats in 2019 pushed for exceptions in the abortion ban, but were rebuffed by majority Republicans.

“At the end of the day, the Republican Party has to be responsible for what they have done,” he said. “They need to watch how they're passing these laws that could affect people, and this is one of the unintended consequences they never saw coming. This is what we keep trying to tell them on a regular basis. This is theirs. They need to fix it.”

Brian Lyman and Jemma Stephenson contributed to this report.

Louisiana Illuminator is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Greg LaRose for questions: info@lailluminator.com. Follow Louisiana Illuminator on Facebook and Twitter.

Read More

The post Trump comes out against Alabama IVF ruling as national Republicans scramble for distance appeared first on lailluminator.com

Please follow and like us:
Pin Share
Continue Reading

Louisiana Illuminator

Nitrogen gas, electric chair executions get Louisiana House approval 

Published

on

lailluminator.com – Piper Hutchinson – 2024-02-23 16:06:45

Nitrogen gas, electric chair executions get Louisiana House approval 

by Piper Hutchinson, Louisiana Illuminator
February 23, 2024

The Louisiana House of Representatives voted Friday to approve one new and one previously used method of execution. The legislation also shields records related to executions from public view under threat of criminal penalties for anyone who leaks them. 

The House backed House Bill 6, by Rep. Nicholas Muscarello, R-Hammond, to nitrogen gas and electrocution to the legal methods the state can use to execute people. The bill also shields records from the public that cover companies or pharmacies that sell execution drugs and equipment to the state. Anyone who violated the law could be subject to up to two years in prison and a fine reaching $50,000.

Muscarello's bill advanced on a largely party-lines 71-29 vote, though Republican Reps. Stephanie Hilferty of New Orleans, Brach Myers of Lafayette and Barbara Freiberg of Baton Rouge voted against the bill, while Democratic Reps. Vanessa LaFleur of Baton Rouge and Patricia Moore of Monroe supported it. 

GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

SUBSCRIBE

“It's time to honor the victims. That's what this bill does,” Muscarello told representatives during floor debate. 

Louisiana banned execution by electric chair in 1991, when it was last used, in favor of lethal injection. At the time, Louisiana faced a court challenge from plaintiffs who alleged electrocution was an unconstitutionally cruel and unusual punishment. 

It's been 14 years since Louisiana executed someone by lethal injection, a method that has been difficult to carry out in states that use it because of a shortage of drugs needed. Death penalty proponents have argued drugmakers are reluctant to increase supplies because of the negative stigma.

Resuming executions is the sole goal of the legislation, Muscarello has said. Republicans in favor of the proposal, including Gov. Jeff Landry, have called on the state to resume executions in order to fulfill what they describe as a contract between the state and victims' loved ones. 

Activity on death row is a key priority for Landry, the self-styled tough-on-crime governor, who has long supported expanding the methods by which Louisiana executes people. 

The overwhelming approval in the House puts the state one step closer to carrying out its first execution since 2010. At present, there are two people on death row who have exhausted their appeals. They include Ted Wessinger, who killed two people in 1995, including Stephanie Guzzardo, whose father Wayne has testified in favor of Muscarello's legislation. 

Most states that withhold execution-related records don't criminally penalize those who go public with the information. The only one that does, Arkansas, has not executed anyone since its shield law was approved. Despite making leaks of the information a felony, Arkansas has been unable to obtain drugs needed for execution — even though its corrections department said it is actively looking for them

Democrats proposed several amendments meant to bring transparency to executions, all but one of which failed. 

Muscarello allowed a change Rep. Mandie Landry, D-New Orleans, proposed that would prevent legislators, the governor and their immediate family members from selling execution supplies to the state. Muscarello said he believed the amendment is duplicative of existing ethics laws but allowed it regardless. 

While Muscarello said he trusted the state to act ethically and legally — pushing back on the need for more public scrutiny — several critics of his proposal pointed to an incident in which the state was not upfront with a supplier. 

In 2014, the state purchased hydromorphone from Lake Charles Memorial Hospital with the intent of using it to carry out an execution, The Lens reported. Officials didn't inform the hospital why it wanted the drugs, and the hospital leadership told The Lens it would not have provided the drugs if they had known what it was for. 

Republicans killed another amendment from Rep. Mandie Landry that would have required the state to notify suppliers the state intended to use the items purchased from them in an execution. 

Muscarello's bill will next be heard in a Senate committee next week. 

SUPPORT NEWS YOU TRUST.

DONATE

Louisiana Illuminator is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Greg LaRose for questions: info@lailluminator.com. Follow Louisiana Illuminator on Facebook and Twitter.

Read More

The post Nitrogen gas, electric chair executions get Louisiana House approval  appeared first on lailluminator.com

Please follow and like us:
Pin Share
Continue Reading

Louisiana Illuminator

More than 500 new Russia sanctions levied by White House after Navalny death

Published

on

lailluminator.com – Jacob Fischler – 2024-02-23 12:45:45

More than 500 new Russia sanctions levied by White House after Navalny death

by Jacob Fischler, Louisiana Illuminator
February 23, 2024

The Biden administration will impose a new round of economic sanctions targeting Russian fuel exports and military-industry imports, the Treasury Department announced Friday.

Coming one week after Russian opposition leader Alexei Navalny died in the custody of Russian President Vladimir Putin's government and one day short of the two-year anniversary of the country's invasion of Ukraine, the more than 500 new sanctions include targets inside and outside of Russia and are meant to disrupt Putin's ability to fund and wage war.

“Our sanctions have two goals,” Deputy Treasury Secretary Wally Adeyemo said Friday. “Reduce the revenues the Kremlin has to fuel its war of choice, and disrupt Russia's ability to get the goods it needs to build the weapons the Kremlin wants.”

The sanctions were designed to “crack down” on Russia's efforts to evade existing measures to disrupt the export of Russian energy, Adeyemo said in an appearance Friday at the Council on Foreign Relations, according to a department transcript.

Russia has spent considerable resources to avoid previous sanctions, Adeyemo said. Those efforts take away from what Russia can commit to the battlefield, he added.

GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

SUBSCRIBE

Other targets

Friday's sanctions also target third-country individuals and entities that provide Russia with weapons and other tools of war.

Those targets include six China-based technology suppliers and a precious metals investment firm based in Liechtenstein and owned by German nationals. They also include manufacturers based in Serbia, Estonia, Ireland, the Kyrgyz Republic and Finland, according to a news release from the Treasury Department.

The Treasury Department's Office of Foreign Assets Control also listed new targets in Russia's military-industrial, financial and other sectors.

Companies include manufacturers or providers of weapons, 3D printers, metalworking equipment, industrial chemicals, semiconductors and other electronics, military informational technology, industrial automation, optics such as thermal imaging technology, navigational instruments, energy storage, aerospace, logistics and precious metals.

Treasury sanctioned nearly 300 companies. Together with sanctions from the departments of State and Commerce, the total announced Friday was more than 590, according to the Treasury Department.

The State Department would add three Russian government officials related to Navalny's death to its sanctions list, according to the Treasury Department release. The State Department had not released its own list as of midday Friday.

Sen. Sherrod Brown, an Ohio Democrat who chairs the Senate Banking Committee, said in a statement that the sanctions were appropriate to hold Putin accountable.

“Putin believes he can murder opponents and critics with impunity,” Brown said. “We must prove him wrong. The United States and the West must continue to hold the lawless Russian regime accountable. We must use every tool to protect U.S. national security and stand with our allies.”

Democrats travel to Ukraine

U.S. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer of New York led a delegation of Senate Democrats to Ukraine this week. In Lyiv on Friday, he told reporters that the group sought to pressure U.S. House Speaker Mike Johnson, a Louisiana Republican, to support an aid package to the country that is running low on supplies to defend against Russia.

“Without the aid, Ukraine, America should know, Speaker Johnson and the House Republicans should know, without the aid, we will lose the war,” Schumer said, according to a transcript provided by his office.

“But conversely, we were told by just about everyone we saw — American, Ukrainian, military, political, diplomatic — that if they get the aid, if Ukraine gets the aid, it will win the war.”

Sens. Jack Reed of Rhode Island, Michael Bennet of Colorado, Maggie Hassan of New Hampshire and Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut were part of the delegation with Schumer.

The Senate approved in a bipartisan vote this month a $95 billion package for emergency military aid for Ukraine, Israel and Taiwan.

But the House, where Republicans have for months blocked any military assistance to Ukraine, has not acted on the measure.

President Joe Biden also urged the nation's governors to press for Ukraine assistance during a meeting at the White House Friday.

After a campaign stop in California Thursday, Biden repeated his view that Putin is “responsible for” Navalny's death. The outspoken Putin opponent, who was nearly killed by poison in 2020, died in a Russian prison last week.

The circumstances of his death are not clear in the West, but Biden has placed the blame on Putin.

Former United Nations Ambassador Nikki Haley, who is challenging former President Donald Trump for the Republican presidential nomination, indicated in a Friday statement that she would treat Russia more harshly than either Biden or Trump.

“When it comes to Russia, Joe Biden has been five steps behind, and Donald Trump is openly appeasing Vladimir Putin,” she said.

SUPPORT NEWS YOU TRUST.

DONATE

Louisiana Illuminator is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Greg LaRose for questions: info@lailluminator.com. Follow Louisiana Illuminator on Facebook and Twitter.

Read More

The post More than 500 new Russia sanctions levied by White House after Navalny death appeared first on lailluminator.com

Please follow and like us:
Pin Share
Continue Reading

News from the South

Trending