Connect with us

Louisiana Illuminator

Cities are embracing teen curfews, though they might not curb crime



lailluminator.com – Amanda Hernández – 2023-08-29 07:04:11

Cities are embracing teen curfews, though they might not curb crime

by Amanda Hernández, Louisiana Illuminator
August 29, 2023

In response to growing public concern over crime, cities and counties throughout the United States are returning to a familiar tool: curfews for young people.

Proponents argue curfews curb crime and protect youth by keeping them off the streets. But research suggests curfews are ineffective, and some juvenile justice advocates and experts warn of unintended consequences such as increased racial profiling, and strained relationships between police and teens.

More than a dozen cities and counties have reinstated or enforced juvenile curfews this year, including Washington, D.C.; Memphis, Tennessee; New Smyrna Beach, Florida; Sea Isle City, New Jersey; and Fulton County, Georgia. Philadelphia and Chicago made their curfews permanent last year.

Vicksburg, Mississippi, recently reinstated its curfew following a shooting in January that killed a 13-year-old and left two others injured. The city also has implemented a community policing program and allocated $200,000 in funding for a center where children and their families can receive mentoring, tutoring and mental health support.

“If you limit the opportunity for youth to be out at 11 o'clock, 12 o'clock, one o'clock and two o'clock in the morning, you limit and control that exposure, and then you put it back where it ought to be — in the home,” Vicksburg Mayor George Flaggs Jr. told Stateline. “I'm a stern believer that you can't be too punitive. … You have to deal with it from a holistic point of view and that is, include the family, the school and the community.”

Both he and police Chief Penny Jones said crime rates in the community have decreased since the curfew started.

“Kids will get use [sic] to it and it will become the norm. We just want to be sure our youth are safe,” Jones wrote in an email.

Axl, a 19-year-old Kentucky resident, poses with his former Youth Advocate Programs advocate, Madison Rymer. Youth Advocate Programs is a national nonprofit that provides community-based alternatives to out-of-home placements. (Courtesy of Axl)

But some elected officials moved in the other direction. In June, Texas Republican Gov. Greg Abbott signed into law a statewide ban on curfews that prohibits both cities and counties from implementing them. The ban will take effect in September.

Texas state Rep. David Cook, a Republican who wrote the bill, said he hopes to see “a better relationship between juveniles and law enforcement agencies” as a result of the statewide ban on curfews. Cook also raised concerns that curfews could violate constitutional rights.

“There's a lot that we can do as a state to improve the juvenile system,” Cook said in an interview with Stateline. “The more that we can have community-based programs, the better off juveniles are going to be with regard to trying to reform their behavior for a better future.”

The District of Columbia is one of the latest cities to enforce a juvenile curfew. The city's curfew targets seven specific areas and prohibits those under the age of 17 from being outdoors past 11 p.m. on weekdays and midnight on weekends. Minors who violate the curfew will be taken to the Department of Youth Rehabilitation Services, where they will be reunited with their families and provided with rehabilitative services and support.

“Our goal isn't to arrest our young people, but we want to ensure the safety of our youth here in the District of Columbia,” said Pamela Smith, the city's police chief, during a news conference this month.

Some cities, including Baltimore and Atlanta, likewise are changing how they handle curfews — opting to reduce or eliminate fines and other penalties and instead provide violators with educational and community-based programs, such as counseling, mentoring and recreational activities. In other jurisdictions, parents and guardians can still receive fines or even go to jail if their kids violate curfew.

Are curfews effective?

In 1996, President Bill Clinton called on cities and towns to impose nightly curfews on teenagers. Today more than 400 towns, cities and counties have enacted youth curfew laws, according to the National Youth Rights Association.

But U.S. juvenile curfews are “ineffective at reducing crime and victimization,” according to a review summarizing the findings of 12 studies that was published in 2016 by the Campbell Collaboration, an international social science research network. The review also found a slight increase in crime during curfew hours and no effect on non-curfew hours.

A paper published in 2014 by the Social Science Research Network measured the effect of the District of Columbia's juvenile curfews on gun violence by analyzing ShotSpotter data from January 2006 through June 2013. The authors found that gunfire incidents increased by 150% when the curfew was in effect. The authors also suggested that curfews keep bystanders and witnesses from the streets, reducing their deterrent effects on crime.

But some local officials have said curfew enforcement led to a decrease in crime within their jurisdictions.

In Prince George's County, Maryland, where local leaders enforced a juvenile curfew last year, officials reported a 20% decrease in overall crime during curfew hours in the first month of enforcement.

We see that communities that have access to resources have the least amount of youth crime, and that's not by coincidence.

– Dafna Gozani, National Center for Youth senior policy attorney

Experts also worry that curfews will disproportionately affect young people of color.

Juvenile curfews may result in increased racial profiling, said William Carbone, a lecturer and the executive director of the Tow Youth Justice Institute at the University of New Haven.

“I don't have a lot of faith in curfews at all,” Carbone said in an interview with Stateline. “When you implement a measure, like curfews, you run the risk of creating worse relationships between the youth and the police, and run the risk of profiling. … It's just one of the areas where kids of color are disproportionately disadvantaged.”

Carbone said curfews may also move crime from one area to another because “kids don't obey geographic boundaries.”

“If there's a curfew in one location, [minors] could move to another location. It doesn't stop the crime,” Carbone said.

Curfews are more likely to harm youth of color because of existing disparities in law enforcement interactions, Candice Jones, the president and CEO of the Public Welfare Foundation, a justice advocacy group, wrote in an email.

“They could be doing something legitimate — coming home from a game late or friend's house studying — but now a curfew has given cause for them to have an interaction with law enforcement, which we know can be particularly dangerous for Black and Brown youth.”

At least 11,680 children under the age of 17 were arrested in 2020 for curfew violations or loitering, according to statistics released by the Department of Justice's Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. Federal data shows that for decades, Black minors have been arrested for curfew and loitering charges at two or three times the rate of their white counterparts. The overall juvenile arrest rate, which includes all offenses, peaked in 1996 and has since declined.



Alternative solutions to youth crime

Some curfew opponents point to approaches such as cognitive behavior therapy, a type of talk therapy that helps identify thought patterns and tries to change them, and tailored drug or mental health treatment programs as more effective strategies, Carbone said.

“Treatments and interventions, and as little contact with police and courts as possible, are very important ingredients in trying to prevent juvenile crime,” Carbone said.

Carbone asserted that diversion — approaches that redirect youth away from the juvenile justice system — works as a proactive measure to engage and prevent youth crime.

“It's very powerful to a young person when they go into a courtroom and the person on the bench, for example, wearing the long black robe, pounds a gavel and says, ‘I find you delinquent.' Kids tend to internalize that and then live up to it,” Carbone said.

To counter this, advocates suggest communities should prioritize comprehensive yearlong programs that allow children to engage in sports, cultural, arts and other social activities.

In Maryland, the Department of Juvenile Services in June launched the Safe Summer initiative, which aims to direct additional resources to counties grappling with higher rates of youth violence and create youth employment opportunities. Connecticut lawmakers passed a bill that expands diversionary programs in the state and encourages police to direct children to juvenile review boards instead of court proceedings.

Axl rides a horse. In the future, Axl would like to go to college and become a horse trainer. (Courtesy of Arianna Gribbin)

In Tacoma, Washington, city leaders launched the city's first free summer youth program, offering recreational activities such as basketball tournaments, games, art and music.

Rather than punishing children and their families with fines for curfew violations, communities should invest in social services and address the root causes of juvenile delinquency, said Dafna Gozani, a senior policy attorney with the National Center for Youth, a nonprofit law firm and juvenile justice advocacy group.

“We see that communities that have access to resources have the least amount of youth crime, and that's not by coincidence,” Gozani said. “We also see that it is incredibly expensive to support the carceral system and that's at the expense of investing in things like education, health care, pro-social activities — all the things that actually prevent kids from coming into the system.”

Axl, a 19-year-old Kentucky resident who requested to be identified by only his first name for privacy reasons, found immense value in participating in the program offered by Youth Advocate Programs, a national nonprofit that provides community-based alternatives to out-of-home placements.

He said the program helped him develop healthy coping mechanisms, strengthen his communication skills and embrace his transgender identity.

“I did have a lot of support in the program and it helped me learn not to be scared to be who I want to be. It showed that I can be different and not have to blend in with everyone else,” Axl said.



This article was first published by Stateline, part of the States Newsroom nonprofit news network with the . It's supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Stateline maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Scott S. Greenberger for questions: info@stateline.org. Follow Stateline on Facebook and X.

Louisiana Illuminator is part of States Newsroom, a network of news bureaus supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Louisiana Illuminator maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Greg LaRose for questions: info@lailluminator.com. Follow Louisiana Illuminator on Facebook and Twitter.

Read More

The post Cities are embracing teen curfews, though they might not curb crime appeared first on lailluminator.com

Please follow and like us:
Pin Share

Louisiana Illuminator

Lawmakers across the U.S. seek to curb utility spending on politics, ads and more extras • Louisiana Illuminator



lailluminator.com – Robert Zullo – 2024-03-03 15:00:47

Lawmakers across the U.S. seek to curb utility spending on politics, ads and more extras

by Robert Zullo, Louisiana Illuminator
March 3, 2024

After a string of scandals and amid rising bills, lawmakers in statehouses across the country have been pushing legislation to curb utilities spending ratepayer money on lobbying, expert testimony in rate cases, goodwill advertising, charitable giving, trade association membership and other costs.

At least a dozen states have considered bills to limit how gas, water and electric utilities can spend customers' money, according to a tracker maintained by the Energy and Policy Institute, a watchdog group funded by environmental and climate-focused foundations that concentrates on utilities and fossil fuel interests.

Another, Louisiana, has opened a proceeding at its public service commission to investigate use of ratepayer cash on trade association dues, “activities meant to influence the outcome of any local, state, or federal legislation,” advertising expenses and other costs.

Michigan joined the party last week with the introduction of legislation to ban utility political spending. In states like Illinois, the push has been joined by groups like the AARP and the Citizens Utility Board, a state watchdog group, which said the legislation would “stop electric, gas and water utilities from charging us for a long list of expenses they rack up trying to raise our rates and further increase their political power.”

Three states  – Maine, Colorado and Connecticut – have already signed similar bills into law. The legislation comes as natural gas bills have fallen but average residential electric prices in the U.S. climbed from 13.66 cents per kilowatt hour in 2021 to 15.93 cents per kilowatt hour in 2023, per the U.S. Energy Information Administration. That would mean a monthly bill going from $136.60 in 2021 to $159.30 in 2023 for a house that uses 1,000 kilowatt hours per month.

“It absolutely is a growing trend,” said Matt Kasper, the Energy and Policy Institute's deputy director. “There's a lot of eyes on the industry, how it's operating.”

The institute published a report last year that scrutinized how electric and gas utilities use ratepayer money to “fund political machines that push legislation, curry favor with regulators and alter the outcomes of elections, sometimes even breaking laws in the process.”

Some of the lowlights include:

A massive bribery scandal in Ohio involving FirstEnergy, a utility holding company that  paid nearly $61 million in bribes to the Ohio house speaker's political organization in exchange for a nuclear plant bailout worth $1 billion to the company. A U.S. attorney called it “one of the largest public corruption conspiracies in Ohio history.”In Illinois, the state's largest electric utility, Commonwealth Edison, or ComEd, showered the state House speaker's allies with jobs, contracts and payments to grease the wheels for the company's legislation. Three ex-lobbyists and a former CEO of the company were convicted by a federal jury last year for their roles in the scheme. The speaker's trial is scheduled facing calls for a federal investigation over accusations of using political consultants to back “ghost candidates” in legislative races to draw votes away from candidates it opposed. It also took over a news website as “part of an elaborate, off-the-books political strategy to advocate for rate hikes, agitate for legislative favors, slam political opponents and eliminate anything  … (that) might undermine its near monopoly on selling power in the Sunshine State,” the Miami Herald reported. That's not to mention accusations of hiring private investigators to follow a newspaper columnist who was critical of the company.

Other examples of questionable spending abound. In 2018, South Carolina lawmakers were flooded with bogus emails encouraging them to support Virginia utility giant Dominion Energy's takeover of SCANA Corp., a company struggling under the weight of a failed nuclear project. Dominion denied having anything to do with the fake emails, which were sent by the Consumer Energy Alliance, a group that was then supported by Dominion. (The company is no longer listed as a CEA member).

Consumer Energy Alliance was also involved in a 2016 campaign to support a natural gas pipeline running through Ohio that involved sending 347 letters to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission using the names of locals — more than a dozen of whom signed affidavits denying they signed the letters —  including “an Ohio man who has been dead since 1998,” The Plain Dealer reported.

In Louisiana, Entergy was fined $5 million by the New Orleans City Council after actors hired by a public relations firm working for the utility showed up at public hearings to support a proposed power plant.

Arizona Public Service, which has 1.4 million electric customers in the state, spent $10 million in 2014 that was funneled to dark money groups to help elect its preferred members of the State Corporation Commission, which regulates utilities. That spending wasn't revealed until 2019, when the company complied with a subpoena to release documents.



‘The appetite is there'

However, bills to curb utility influence spending can face an uphill fight, demonstrating the stronghold that the companies can have on state governments.

In Virginia, for example, another round of legislative attempts to prevent candidates from accepting donations from public service companies like Dominion Energy, the state's largest electric utility and long the biggest corporate donor in Virginia politics, died in House and Senate committees. Both houses are controlled by Democrats.

“Time will tell what will happen,” Del. Josh Cole, a Democrat who was carrying the House version of the legislation,told the Virginia Mercury.  “The appetite is definitely there for it.”

A separate proceeding at the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission has been looking into the “rate recovery, reporting and accounting treatment of industry association dues and certain civic, political and related expenses.”

The Edison Electric Institute, which represents investor-owned electric utilities and is one of the trade groups affected by some of the state-level legislation, said electric customers benefit when its member companies “have a seat at the table,” adding that they are among the most regulated businesses in the nation.

“We engage on their behalf through lobbying, advocacy and regulatory proceedings as part of our work to ensure that electricity customers have the affordable, reliable and resilient clean energy they want and need. Engaging in discussions with policymakers and regulators is essential to achieving these outcomes,” EEI spokeswoman Sarah Durdaller said in a statement. “We bring unique expertise and insights on how policy proposals will affect business operations, the cost for capital, and, ultimately, our customers. … There are strict laws in place already to ensure that lobbying activities are always funded by shareholders not customers.”

The American Gas Association, which represents natural gas utilities, did not respond to a request for comment.

On Monday, across the street from the Washington, D.C., hotel where the National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners was holding its winter policy meeting, a group of climate justice organizations held a rally to call attention to energy company influence, taking aim at corporate sponsorship of the event and a lack of progress on renewable power.

“When we see events like this where utility execs fund gatherings and hobnob with regulators …  we need to speak out,” said Sukrit Mishra, D.C. program director at Solar United Neighbors, a nonprofit that helps communities form solar co-ops. He voiced support for state legislative efforts as well as federal legislation introduced by U.S. Rep. Kathy Castor, a Florida Democrat, to prevent utility companies from using ratepayer dollars to fund political activities.

“The public is ready to hold utilities accountable. We need regulators to do the same.”



Louisiana Illuminator is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Greg LaRose for questions: info@lailluminator.com. Follow Louisiana Illuminator on Facebook and Twitter.

Read More

The post Lawmakers across the U.S. seek to curb utility spending on politics, ads and more extras • Louisiana Illuminator appeared first on lailluminator.com

Please follow and like us:
Pin Share
Continue Reading

Louisiana Illuminator

Telehealth abortions on the rise since Dobbs, new report shows • Louisiana Illuminator



lailluminator.com – Sofia Resnick – 2024-03-03 10:00:24

Telehealth abortions on the rise since Dobbs, new report shows

by Sofia Resnick, Louisiana Illuminator
March 3, 2024

Researchers studying national abortion trends found that in the 15 months since Roe v. Wade fell, abortion rates remained elevated despite more limited access throughout the U.S., according to the Society of Family Planning's latest #WeCount report published Wednesday.

Partially explaining this is a rise in people having abortions via telemedicine, Ushma Upadhyay, co-chair of #WeCount, told States Newsroom. Before the U.S. Supreme Court decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, about 4% of total recorded abortions were via Telehealth abortion; that rose to 16%, as of September 2023.

“Telehealth abortion has really had a huge impact,” said Upadhyay, a professor at the University of California, San Francisco's Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health. “We're addressing unmet need that existed in those states, even before Dobbs. I think that a lot of the unmet need in the blue states is being met, as well as people traveling from states with abortion bans.”

In the nation overall between July and September 2023, there were between 81,000 and 89,000 abortions monthly, numbers that are slightly smaller than in the previous report covering April through June 2023, but higher than in the months leading up to the Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization decision.

“Some of the volume may also be due to reductions of barriers to abortion care, including increased financial support for low-income abortion seekers, reduced burden of cost and travel by use of telehealth, and improved access via care navigation from practical support groups and public health departments,” the report reads.

However, researchers estimate that in the 14 states with total abortion bans, there were approximately 120,000 fewer abortions compared to before Dobbs.

“People in states with abortion bans or severe restrictions were forced to delay their abortions, to travel to another state, to obtain care from a provider in a shield law state, to self-manage their

abortions, or to continue a pregnancy they did not want,” the report reads.

Upadhyay said the recent small increases over the months does not compensate for the declines in banned states.

“Whenever we publish these numbers, we have to publish whatever we find,” she said. “But it is one of our worries that people will think, ‘Oh, there's no longer a problem.' We know that there are thousands of people living in states with abortion bans that continue to not be able to access abortion.”

States with the largest declines in 15 months were Texas (46,200), Georgia (24,640), Tennessee (17,545), Louisiana (11,465), and Alabama (9,525). Researchers saw the largest surges in Illinois (28,665), Florida (15,155), and California (12,515). Numbers in Wisconsin have fluctuated dramatically with its fluctuating abortion legality. Before Dobbs the state saw approximately 600 abortions per month, which dropped to fewer than 10 per month after Dobbs. Researchers recorded 50 abortions in Wisconsin in September 2023, shortly after providers resumed providing abortions following a court decision.

Though the majority were in-clinic abortions, Upadhyay believes the rate of telehealth abortions is likely to rise. There were a reported 14,110 telehealth abortions in July 2023, 14,060 in August, and 13,770 in September, according to the report, which includes in this tally abortions via telehealth provided by brick-and-mortar clinics and virtual-only providers, including those operating in the five states (Colorado, Massachusetts, New York, Vermont, and Washington) that in 2023 started providing abortion care under shield laws to patients from states with abortion restrictions.

The #WeCount team plans to finish collecting state-by-state data as part of this project through December 2024. Among the data's limitations, it doesn't not include self-managed abortions.

Louisiana Illuminator is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Greg LaRose for questions: info@lailluminator.com. Follow Louisiana Illuminator on Facebook and Twitter.

Read More

The post Telehealth abortions on the rise since Dobbs, new report shows • Louisiana Illuminator appeared first on lailluminator.com

Please follow and like us:
Pin Share
Continue Reading

Louisiana Illuminator

Alabama passes IVF protections while red states still push ‘personhood’ abortion laws • Louisiana Illuminator



lailluminator.com – Sofia Resnick – 2024-03-03 05:00:57

Alabama passes IVF protections while red states still push ‘personhood' abortion laws

by Sofia Resnick, Louisiana Illuminator
March 3, 2024

All but six state legislatures are now in session, and abortion-related bills continue to be introduced, especially in states where the procedure is already banned.

It can be hard to monitor them all, so States Newsroom's Reproductive Rights Today team will track certain bills that could become law in their respective states in a biweekly legislative roundup.

Depending on the partisan makeup of a state's legislature and other state government officials, some bills have a higher chance of passing and becoming law than others.


Following an explosive Alabama Supreme Court ruling that frozen embryos count as children under state law, which shut down in vitro fertilization programs in Alabama, the state legislature on Thursday passed Republican-sponsored bills to protect IVF.

House Bill 237: Alabama Reflector reported the measure would protect IVF providers

Alabama state Rep. Terri Collins, R-Decatur, sponsored a bill to allow in vitro fertilization processes to proceed in Alabama after a Feb. 16 state Supreme Court decision shut down most IVF programs in the state. The bill passed the state House and Senate Feb. 29. (Brian Lyman/Alabama Reflector)

from criminal or civil action “except for an act or omission that is both intentional and not arising from or related to IVF services.” The bill sponsors in both chambers called the measure, which will automatically repeal next year, a temporary fix aimed at reopening IVF programs.

State Democrats have criticized the bill for not addressing the state Supreme Court's findings about when life begins. The controversial ruling that a frozen embryo is an unborn child was based in part on a 2018 “Sanctity of Life” constitutional amendment. “If in fact, we have a constitutional amendment that requires us to adopt public policy that these embryos have a right to life, can we pass a law that authorizes life to be taken in fertility clinics?” said Rep. Chris England, D-Tuscaloosa.

Status: Passed Feb. 29 in the House 94-6 and in the Senate (SB 159) 34-0.Sponsor: Republican Rep. Terri Collins, Decatur


Despite the political fallout in Alabama, states continue to introduce proposals to give “personhood” rights to embryos. Abortions are currently protected under Alaska's constitution, but a proposed bill could change that by defining a fetus as a person in the criminal code.

House Bill 107: Alaska Beacon reported the bill would establish the definition of “life” and “person” in criminal law. The proposal has received pushback in the wake of the controversial Alabama IVF ruling. John Skidmore, the deputy attorney general for the criminal division of the Department of Law, said that if passed, it would allow the state to file criminal charges for abortion, though courts would likely rule that unconstitutional.

Status: Introduced in 2023 and heard in the House Judiciary Committee.Sponsor: Republican Rep. Kevin McCabe, Big Lake


As Florida's legislative session comes to an end for the year (last day of the session is March 8), Republicans postponed a bill that would have let people file wrongful death lawsuits for embryos and fetuses.

Senate Bill 476: Florida Phoenix reported the bill's sponsor said the measure needs more work but would not have applied to IVF. As written it would permit lawsuits to recover damages for the wrongful death suit of unborn children at any stage of development.

Status: Temporarily postponed.Sponsor: Republican Sen. Erin Grall, Vero Beach


Abortion is currently legal in Iowa after a court last year blocked a six-week abortion ban. The Iowa House just passed a controversial bill that Democrats warn could result in pushing anti-abortion views and potential misinformation in public schools.

House File 2617: Iowa Capital Dispatch reported the bill would require instructors of human growth and development and health classes to show seventh through 12th grade students ultrasounds and animations that demonstrate the processes of fertilization and fetal development. As an example of acceptable material, the bill cites the “Meet Baby Olivia” produced by the longtime anti-abortion activist group Live Action, best known for trying to entrap Planned Parenthood into criminal activity with undercover . A version of this legislation has been enacted in North Dakota and introduced in Kentucky, Missouri, and West Virginia.

Status: Passed 59-35 this week, going to the Senate for consideration (formerly numbered HF 2031).Sponsor: Republican Rep. Luana Stoltenberg, Davenport


Abortion is currently legal in Kansas through 22 weeks' gestation. Two new bills would add abortion-related restrictions, one that would make abortion coercion a felony and one that would require ultrasounds before abortions.

House Bill 2813: Kansas Reflector reported this bill would make it a felony to try to convince someone to get an abortion using coercion or threats.

Status: Referred to House Committee on Federal and State Affairs.Sponsor: Republican Rep. Rebecca Schmoe, Ottawa

House Bill 2814: Kansas Reflector reported this bill would create the Kansas Ultrasound Act, requiring an obstetric ultrasound to be performed before an abortion. The proposal would allow “a woman to avert her eyes from such images.”

Status: Referred to Committee on Federal and State AffairsSponsor: Republican Leah Howell, Derby, on behalf  of anti-abortion groups Kansans for Life and Kansas Family Voice


Republicans continue trying to apply “personhood” to fetuses and embryos. The next foray in Kentucky, where abortion is banned, is child support. “The support obligation begins as soon as that life begins,” said the bill's sponsor.

Senate Bill 110: Kentucky Lantern reported the proposal would allow Kentuckians to collect child support for fetuses, if an order is in place within a year of the child's birth. But the bill's sponsor says that county attorneys cannot use federal resources to enforce this law, and that he would support a new state appropriation to help fund the enforcement. The bill also has support from Democrats, some of whom want it categorized as maternity care support instead of child support. “I worry about this being a stepping stone to things like in-utero visitation and … the downstream consequences that could arise,” said Sen. Cassie Chambers Armstrong, D-Louisville.

Status: Passed unanimously by Senate committee Feb. 27.Sponsor: Republican Sen. Whitney Westerfield, Fruit Hill

House Bill 711: Kentucky Lantern reported this bill would expand state abortion exceptions to pregnancies caused by rape and incest, but no later than six weeks after the first day of the woman's last menstrual period. The proposal would leave it to the physician to determine if rape or incest had occurred. The bill would also clarify abortion exceptions for fatal fetal anomalies, ectopic pregnancies and miscarriages.

Status: Introduced Feb. 26.Sponsor: Republican Rep. Ken Fleming, Louisville

South Dakota

Abortion is currently illegal in South Dakota, but that could change with a potential ballot-question decision. In an attempt to thwart the measure, Republicans have advanced a bill that would allow people to remove their signatures from ballot-question petitions.

House Bill 1244: South Dakota Searchlight reports that an emergency clause in the legislation would make it effective immediately, ahead of this spring's deadline for petitions to place questions on the Nov. 5 general election ballot. Initiated measures and referendums need 17,508 signatures from registered voters to make the ballot; initiated constitutional amendments need 35,017. Rick Weiland of Dakotans for Health said the abortion-rights ballot petitions already have 50,000 signatures.

Status: Passed 59-9 Feb. 20; passed Senate State Affairs Committee Feb. 28.Sponsor: Republican Rep. Jon Hansen, Dell Rapids


Abortion is currently legal in Utah up to 18 weeks' gestation, awaiting a state Supreme Court decision on whether to uphold a trigger abortion ban. In an attempt to try to speed up the court's decision, Republican lawmakers, on the last day of the legislative session, passed a bill that would repeal last year's legislation that bans abortion clinics.

House Bill 560: Utah News Dispatch reported the bill would repeal portions of HB 467 that are already enjoined in court. Democrats have argued the bill disrupts the separation of powers by interfering in ongoing litigation.

Status: Passed House 59-10 on Feb. 21; passed Senate 24-0 on March 1.Sponsor: Republican House Majority Whip Karianne Lisonbee, Clearfield

West Virginia

Abortion is currently illegal in West Virginia. This week state senators voted to require high schoolers to watch a video created by the anti-abortion activist group Live Action.

Senate Bill 468: West Virginia Watch reported the bill would require eighth and 10th grade public school students to view a video called “Meet Baby Olivia,” which depicts insemination fetal development. Republican Sen. Tom Takubo, a doctor, voiced concerns about the measure during debate, saying there were “discrepancies in the video that are grossly inaccurate.”

Status: Passed the Senate 27-6 on Feb. 27; referred to House Health and Human Resources Committee.Sponsor: Republican Sen. Patricia Rucker, Jefferson


Abortion is currently legal in Wyoming, but Republican lawmakers are trying to increase regulations for clinics by requiring them to be licensed surgical centers and for their doctors to have admitting privileges at a nearby hospital. In 2016 the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that a similar law in Texas was unconstitutional.

House Bill 148: WyoFile reported this bill was amended last week to require patients to undergo an ultrasound at least 48 hours before the abortion. Currently, having an ultrasound is optional.

Status: Passed the House 53-9 on Feb. 23 and the Senate 24-6 on March 1.Sponsor: Republican Rep. Chip Neiman, Hulett

U.S. Congress

Meanwhile, this week the U.S. Senate failed to pass a bill to protect IVF access nationwide.

S. 3612: States Newsroom reported the bill, introduced earlier this year, would bar limitations on “assisted reproductive technology services” that are “more burdensome than limitations or requirements imposed on medically comparable procedures, do not significantly advance reproductive health or the safety of such services and unduly restrict access to such services.” In the wake of the recent IVF situation in Alabama, the SenateDemocratic sponsor asked for unanimous consent in the Senate to avoid having to send the bill to the House. But Republican Sen. Cindy Hyde-Smith of Mississippi blocked the bill.

Status: Introduced in January; failed unanimous consent request Feb. 28.Sponsor: Democratic U.S. Sen. Tammy Duckworth, Illinois



Louisiana Illuminator is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Greg LaRose for questions: info@lailluminator.com. Follow Louisiana Illuminator on Facebook and Twitter.

Read More

The post Alabama passes IVF protections while red states still push ‘personhood' abortion laws • Louisiana Illuminator appeared first on lailluminator.com

Please follow and like us:
Pin Share
Continue Reading

News from the South